The reframe
“No experience” almost always means “no job titles” — which is not the same thing. An employer hiring at entry level is not looking for a work history they know you don't have. They are looking for evidence that you can take on something, follow it through, and produce a result. That evidence exists in places a first CV usually leaves out or undersells.
What legitimately counts
Coursework and dissertation projects — with what you produced and what it showed, not just the module name. Part-time and seasonal work: a shift job proves reliability, cash handling, dealing with the public under pressure. Volunteering with a responsibility attached. Society and committee roles where you organised something real. Sport at a level that took sustained commitment. Caring responsibilities. Self-taught skills with something to show for them — a build, a portfolio, a certificate.
The test for every entry is the same: can you say what you did and what changed because you did it? If yes, it is evidence, whatever heading it sits under.
What order it goes in
Education first, while it is your strongest and most recent evidence — degree, relevant modules with outcomes, dissertation if it fits the role. Then a projects or experience section carrying everything above. Skills after that, kept to what you can demonstrate. This ordering flips later in a career, when work history takes over the top slot; a first CV that buries education at the bottom is copying the wrong template.
Before and after: the same entry, rewritten
Before
“Member of the university marketing society. Helped with events and social media.”
After
“Events officer, university marketing society (2024–25). Organised a 3-event speaker series end to end — booked speakers, ran promotion, managed the budget. Attendance grew from ~30 to ~90 across the series; handed over a documented playbook to next year's committee.”
Three changes did all the work: a named role instead of “member”, verbs that describe what was actually done instead of “helped with”, and a result with numbers. Nothing was invented — the evidence was already there; the first version just declined to present it.
What not to do
Don't pad with hobbies that carry no evidence (“socialising with friends”). Don't list every module — pick the relevant ones. Don't claim skills you cannot demonstrate if asked in the interview. And don't open with a personal statement that could belong to anyone; if it isn't specific, cut it and let the evidence open instead.
NodusTech